![]() Gaijin improved it somewhat by knocking a bunch of 3.7 ships down to 3.3 but even then the British are still inferior to other 3.3 ships by a considerable margin.įinally the UI in naval can be improved massively. The ones that are only equipped with 7.7mm guns literally can't kill anything. The other big issue is that naval BRs just aren't adjusted frequently enough, and there are some ships that are just useless. Add to it the weird meme ships like cruisers that use 127-130mm guns that are next to useless against cruisers and only really scary to destroyers and it os just frustrating. The main pain in naval BR wise that I find is when you are first getting into destroyers amd cruisers, mostly because those specific vehicles are just terrible, classic example is the British Clemson. The typical WT complaint of BR being too compressed, when there are barely any vehicles to compress, yet because of a handful out outliers everybody calls for BRs to be massively expanded. For fuck's sake Gaijin, move it 4.7, it is not okay And you people brigading the comment sections of devblogs asking for them is not going to make them come any quicker, so just stop. They are not allowed to tell you unless you see the devblog for them. Battlecruisers might come this update, they might not. And a message if they happen to be here: It's not fucking working, so stop asking. It might seem like they are numerous, but they really aren't. They've been going around various naval-based communities and ranting and begging for BCs. Based on a few people I've been talking to, they are rather well known in the Naval community, and indeed I know them personally. If you've looked at the two recent devblogs, you might have seen a few select individuals asking for battlecruisers. More ranting about the community, because I'm not done yet: A certain very vocal minority(Though this could apply to War Thunder as a whole). I'm not going to gatekeep naval forces "hur, you can only complain about naval if you've played it for 300 hours and have slit your wrists at least 12 times," but at least have some in-depth experience with it before complaining. But apparently not those naval-haters! Some may have played naval, but generally for about 1 or 2 matches, before leaving and going to complain on reddit. I have no top tier tanks, so I would never have any authority to complain about them. They see some negative comments on reddit, or maybe watch napalmratte rant for 10 minutes, and *boom* suddenly they're an expert on the subject. Many people having never actually played naval forces. If you are stuck with the Clemson, or the Frunze, or the Omahas, then all you can do is sit there and be the free RP and SL pinatas to Helenas and Sumners.Ī terrible, terrible community: That's right! This is your fault too! People constantly complain and bash naval forces. If they don't have any meta ships? Well then tough luck, drop back down to a BR where you do, and grind with that. People are forced to play completely meta ships, or else they become completely worthless. Rigid meta and BR structure: This goes hand-in-hand with over compression. And top tier heavy cruisers cost more RP than a 10.0 tank, and quite a bit more SL. Very poor economy: A 12 kill game in naval earns you about the same SL as a 3 or 4 kill game of air RB, or a 6 kill game of tank RB. ![]() Just 15 BRs for 7 boat classes, and at top to mid tiers, you really start to feel it. Over compression of BRs: Over compression is present in all game modes, but I think it's especially prevalent in Naval. Here are some of the biggest issues I have with naval I'm sick and tired of naval being constantly and relentlessly bashed by everyone, whether or not they actually play it. That's right! We do exist! And goddamn, am I going to tell people about it!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |